Monday, April 16, 2012

something funny i realized

what i find to be funny about wow is that they call the class that's able to sneak around and put knives in peoples backs rogue and they call the class that is a master of ranged dps hunter. well what i find to be a funny goof that blizzard made is that hunters are actually a type of rogue so basically the way that i see it should have gone and i think this would be a cool fix is if they named the rogue class something like brigand or assassin, and they named the hunters something like ranger, or marksman.



tell me what u think:)
I don't understand how you thing that the hunter is a type of rogue when they walk around with an animal that they found in the wild and tamed to follow them and fight their enemies for them while taking all the damage like the hunter's own personal tank and keeping them from taking damage themselves so they can keep shooting while the pet keeps fighting while a rogue has no such animal that they tamed to fight alongside of them or take damage for them but instead have poisons they put on their weapons and sneak up from behind to stun their enemies which is very unlike how a hunter does it with his pet fighting out in the open the way it does all the while it's growling to intimidate the enemy even more while the rogue then sneaks up behind another enemy to kill it while the other enemy he stunned is still standing there stunned from the blow to the head that the rogue gave him just a few moments before so he could kill the other enemy and meanwhile the hunter is using his pet to gather up a whole bunch of enemies at once because the pet can take that kind of abuse and then when they're all gathered up the hunter starts killing them one after the other until they're all dead because they couldn't kill the hunter's pet because he was constantly healing his pet with his mending spell while the rogue just sneaks off into the shadow yet again to go get his next victim so I don't think their names should be changed or anything like that because I think they both fit their role in a group just fine with how they are now.





You get what I'm saying?
hahaha^
what i find to be funny about wow is that they call the class that's able to sneak around and put knives in peoples backs rogue and they call the class that is a master of ranged dps hunter. well what i find to be a funny goof that blizzard made is that hunters are actually a type of rogue so basically the way that i see it should have gone and i think this would be a cool fix is if they named the rogue class something like brigand or assassin, and they named the hunters something like ranger, or marksman.
I don't understand how you thing that the hunter is a type of rogue when they walk around with an animal that they found in the wild and tamed to follow them and fight their enemies for them while taking all the damage like the hunter's own personal tank and keeping them from taking damage themselves so they can keep shooting while the pet keeps fighting while a rogue has no such animal that they tamed to fight alongside of them or take damage for them but instead have poisons they put on their weapons and sneak up from behind to stun their enemies which is very unlike how a hunter does it with his pet fighting out in the open the way it does all the while it's growling to intimidate the enemy even more while the rogue then sneaks up behind another enemy to kill it while the other enemy he stunned is still standing there stunned from the blow to the head that the rogue gave him just a few moments before so he could kill the other enemy and meanwhile the hunter is using his pet to gather up a whole bunch of enemies at once because the pet can take that kind of abuse and then when they're all gathered up the hunter starts killing them one after the other until they're all dead because they couldn't kill the hunter's pet because he was constantly healing his pet with his mending spell while the rogue just sneaks off into the shadow yet again to go get his next victim so I don't think their names should be changed or anything like that because I think they both fit their role in a group just fine with how they are now.





You get what I'm saying?


Um...no...
Seriously, I couldn't even read that. @_@
However, I'm pretty sure I agree with you. The names are fine how they are.
Um...no...
Seriously, I couldn't even read that. @_@
However, I'm pretty sure I agree with you. The names are fine how they are.


Was it my lack of punctuation?
Are you saying you were able to read the OP much better?




Two bee come. The hunter won. Must, no? There pray.

No comments:

Post a Comment